SERVICES IN DEVELOPMENT
Built around your
engineering reality.
We’re developing a focused set of services for teams exploring agentic workflows. Each begins with a specific problem, a clear owner and a way to judge the result.
01 / WORKFLOW DISCOVERYIn development
Find the right first use case.
Map a recurring engineering task, its inputs, decisions and failure modes. Identify where an agent can help and where human judgment is essential.
- Workflow and system mapping
- Candidate use cases and practical constraints
- A bounded pilot with acceptance criteria
02 / PROMPT GOVERNANCEIn development
Make prompts managed assets.
Develop a shared prompt register with ownership, version history, test examples and change review. Connect each approved prompt to a defined workflow and tool boundary.
- Prompt lifecycle and approval process
- Representative evaluations and regression checks
- Change history and retirement criteria
03 / SHARED MCP INTEGRATIONIn development
Connect tools with purpose.
Design shared Model Context Protocol interfaces to approved project records and engineering tools. Use individual identities and enforce access at the service boundary.
- Scoped tools and shared context contracts
- Read access separated from change authority
- Attribution, audit and integration checks
04 / MANAGED COLLABORATIONIn development
Keep humans and agents in step.
Use a managed project workflow to coordinate research, engineering and review. Keep proposals, owner decisions and verified outcomes distinguishable.
- Durable work items and structured handoffs
- Human review and scoped execution gates
- Outcome evidence and operational ownership
Start small. Prove the value. Expand deliberately.
These services are being developed. Contact us to discuss your requirements and the suitability of an exploratory engagement.
A FOCUSED FIRST ENGAGEMENT
From a recurring task
to a reviewable pilot.
An exploratory engagement should leave you with a clearer workflow and evidence to judge its usefulness. The starting point is your engineering problem and the people accountable for it.
01Understand the work
Walk through the current task with its owner. Identify the systems involved, the decisions that need judgment and the information people repeatedly have to collect.
02Define a small pilot
Agree a bounded workflow, approved inputs and tool permissions. Specify the expected output, who reviews it and what would make the pilot worth continuing.
03Review what happened
Compare the pilot with the current process. Look at time spent, quality of evidence, correction effort and whether another engineer can use the resulting handoff.
Scope, suitability and any engagement terms would be agreed before a pilot begins.